Current Statistical Research: Anti Chinese Sentiment on Xinjiang, and Li-Meng Yan's COVID Article
- Dr Bruce Long
- Dec 9, 2020
- 5 min read
I am seeking OSF collaborators and funding grant sources for these projects and their statistical experiments (Chinese sources are more than acceptable in the broad context of Sino-western research and competing think tanks in this region.) Please contact Dr Bruce Long dr.bruce.long@outlook.com
Project 1
Abstract (Draft): We are interested in the effect of religious belief, epistemic beliefs, and psychological profile on levels of Western anti-China sentiment.
Projects 2 and 3
We are interested in developing an information source-set robustness and statistical reliability measure or index for applications in political psychology and political philosophy. The specific context for application is Sino-Western relations, anti-China propaganda, and anti-China sentiement. We are designing two naturalistic studies as pilots, to be further developed into larger naturalistic studies, or else quasi-experiments or full experiments. The pilots and a meta-analysis of similar studies will be used to ascertain required sample sizes to achieve statistical power of 80% with meaningful minimum effect sizes (dependent on test statistics chosen.).
Abstract 2 (Draft) : The first experiment is intended to test how much knowledge of the upstream information sources and information source sets of Li-Meng Yan’s COVID-19 article, and of the pre-reviews of that article, inform the public’s reception of the article and their subsequent level of anti-China sentiment. The specific statistical models to be deployed are yet to be determined, and will depend upon initial pilots and meta-analyses used to determine minimum sample sizes and appropriate independent, or predictor, variables.
Abstract 3 (Draft) : The second study design is test how much knowledge of the various kinds of upstream information sources (ranked according to reliability) about Xinjiang and Uyghurs influences the degree of anti-China sentiment (dependent variable), of members of the public and policy makers in the West. Participants will be asked to complete an initial survey indicating reliable they think sources are (Likert Scale) and why.
Method (Draft):
The pilot is likely to be developed using Prolific Academic or MTurk. The full experiment may also involve an analysis of social media output from Twitter and other websites on belonging to media, government, and research bodies and institutes.
Independent or predictor variables are likely to include:
- Degree and type of exposure to information and pseudo-information source sets from media and social media sources.
- Degree and type of exposure to information and pseudo-information from sources like ASPI, Australia’s DFAT, and The US Department of State on line media
- Degree and type of exposure to information and pseudo-information from Chinese government affiliated or marked on line sources.
- Objective reliability rankings of all information sources based upon a formal ranking scale being developed by SWRG sing information theoretic precepts and principles (this will include a formal, or standardised, classification of sources versus pseudo-information sources).
The specific statistical models to be deployed are yet to be determined, and will depend upon initial pilots and meta-analyses used to determine minimum sample sizes and appropriate independent, or predictor, variables. They are likely to involve ANOVA, ANCOVA, and/or regressions analysis.
There may be a temporal sequence or within-participants component for before and after exposure to sources like ASPI, Australia’s DFAT, and The US Department of State on line media.
Anti-China and pro-China sentiment will be measured using standardised sentiment surveys and scoring systems.
Bibliography
A., V., & Sonawane, S. S. (2016). Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data: A Survey of Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016908625
Bermingham, A., & Smeaton, A. F. (2011). On Using Twitter to Monitor Political Sentiment and Predict Election Results. Psychology.
Brambilla, M., & Butz, D. A. (2013). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes : Macro-level symbolic threat increases prejudice against gay men. Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000127
Buntain, C., McGrath, E., Golbeck, J., & LaFree, G. (2016). Comparing social media and traditional surveys around the boston marathon bombing. CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Burris, C. T., & Rempel, J. K. (2004). “It’s the End of the World as We Know It”: Threat and the Spatial-Symbolic Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.19
Charles-Toussaint, G. C., & Crowson, H. M. (2010). Prejudice against international students: The role of threat perceptions and authoritarian dispositions in U.S. students. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.496643
Feldman, R. (2013). Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2436256.2436274
González, K. V., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J., & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X284443
Harell, A., Soroka, S., & Iyengar, S. (2017). Locus of Control and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12338
Hasan, A., Moin, S., Karim, A., & Shamshirband, S. (2018). Machine Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis for Twitter Accounts. Mathematical and Computational Applications. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca23010011
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. In Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
Hyvärinen, A., & Oja, E. (2000). Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5
Kinder, D. R. (1978). Political person perception: The asymmetrical influence of sentiment and choice on perceptions of presidential candidates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.859
Kontopoulos, E., Berberidis, C., Dergiades, T., & Bassiliades, N. (2013). Ontology-based sentiment analysis of twitter posts. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.001
Lorenz-Reaves, A. R. (2017). Affective and Cognitive Responses to Insects and Other Arthropods. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
M., V., Vala, J., & Balani, P. (2016). A Survey on Sentiment Analysis Algorithms for Opinion Mining. International Journal of Computer Applications. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016907977
Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., Srivastava, S., Cohen, A. B., & Miller, D. T. (2012). The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00875.x
Medhat, W., Hassan, A., & Korashy, H. (2014). Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.04.011
Miller, A. S., & Mitamura, T. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy? In Social Psychology Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090141
Miller, P. R. (2011). The Emotional Citizen: Emotion as a function of political sophistication. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00824.x
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011
Paxton, P., & Mughan, A. (2006). What’s to fear from immigrants? Creating an assimilationist threat scale. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00520.x
Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015). A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015
Renfro, C. L., Duran, A., Stephan, W. G., & Clason, D. L. (2006). The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries. In Journal of Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00003.x
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. In Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
Rios, K., Sosa, N., & Osborn, H. (2018). An experimental approach to intergroup threat theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat. European Review of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537049
Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Valiente, R. M., Olmedo, M., Callejas, B., Santed, M. A., & Campagne, D. M. (2013). DIMENSIONS OF SENSITIVITY TO DISGUST IN THE SPANISH POPULATION. REVISTA ARGENTINA DE CLINICA PSICOLOGICA.
Singer, E., & Hudson, V. M. (2020). Political Psychology and Foreign Policy. In Political Psychology and Foreign Policy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429302282
Soleymani, M., Garcia, D., Jou, B., Schuller, B., Chang, S. F., & Pantic, M. (2017). A survey of multimodal sentiment analysis. Image and Vision Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2017.08.003
Soroka, S., Young, L., & Balmas, M. (2015). Bad News or Mad News? Sentiment Scoring of Negativity, Fear, and Anger in News Content. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215569217
Staerklé, C. (2015). Political Psychology. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24079-8
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of Information Load and Percentage of Shared Information on the Dissemination of Unshared Information During Group Discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81
Stephan, C. W., Stephan, W. G., Demitrakis, K. M., Yamada, A. M., & Clason, D. L. (2000). Women’s attitudes toward men: An integrated threat theory approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01022.x
Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280
Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Reysen, S. (2010). Perceiving your group’s future to be in Jeopardy: Extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210372505
Yi, J., Nasukawa, T., Bunescu, R., & Niblack, W. (2003). Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2003.1250949

Comments